DEMOCRATIC TORTURED LOGIC ON THE TROOPS

I cannot believe people swallow the nonsense that Democrats use to fake their support for the troops. Every time I hear them say, I support the troops but I don’t support the war I want to scream, “What a boat load of crap.” Through such logic the democrats think they are demonstrating their support for the troops. It’s a lie, they don’t support the troops and no matter how many times they repeat the lie it doesn’t change what they do.

You cannot separate your support for an institution from the purpose and work of that institution. Need an example? I support the Red Cross but I don’t support the work of the Red Cross. If we heard someone say that we would think, “what are you some kind of nut, if you don’t support the work of the Red Cross, don’t say you support the Red Cross.”

Think about it for a moment, what is the work and purpose of the military? According to the army field manual, “The Army’s nonnegotiable contract with the American people is to fight and win our Nation’s wars.” Now if that is their work and purpose how can the Democrats say I support the troops and not support what they do?

Through their murky logic they think you can separate the people of an organization from the work of the organization. Suppose I say I support the Red Cross worker but I don’t support what they do? To which any intelligent person would think, “How can you do that because they are one in the same thing.” We all understand if you work for the Red Cross institution then you have accepted the purpose of that institution. Therefore you cannot make a distinction between people of an institution and what they do. Either we support them and what they do or we don’t.

Neither can we separate a people of an organization from the leadership of the organization. The Democrats would like you to think that the war is the result of bad leadership so in that way they can say, “we support the troops but we don’t support the war because it’s the result of bad leadership.” However, that is equivalent to saying, “Because the leadership of the Red Cross made a bad decision I do not support the work of the Red Cross.” If you really and truly supported the Red Cross that would be a dumb thing to say would it not? You would understand the work of Red Cross needs to go on while you remedy the leadership issue.

However, is that the way the Democrats have behaved? They debate resolutions that condemn the work of the troops and ponder cutting off support for them so they can stop what they are doing as they say, “we support the troops.” Don’t be fooled, for words to be true they must be matched by actions that back up those words; otherwise they are nothing more than a lie.

DEMOCRATIC TORTURED LOGIC ON THE TROOPS

I cannot believe people swallow the nonsense that Democrats use to fake their support for the troops. Every time I hear them say, I support the troops but I don’t support the war I want to scream, “What a boat load of crap.” Through such logic the democrats think they are demonstrating their support for the troops. It’s a lie, they don’t support the troops and no matter how many times they repeat the lie it doesn’t change what they do.

You cannot separate your support for an institution from the purpose and work of that institution. Need an example? I support the Red Cross but I don’t support the work of the Red Cross. If we heard someone say that we would think, “what are you some kind of nut, if you don’t support the work of the Red Cross, don’t say you support the Red Cross.”

Think about it for a moment, what is the work and purpose of the military? According to the army field manual, “The Army’s nonnegotiable contract with the American people is to fight and win our Nation’s wars.” Now if that is their work and purpose how can the Democrats say I support the troops and not support what they do?

Through their murky logic they think you can separate the people of an organization from the work of the organization. Suppose I say I support the Red Cross worker but I don’t support what they do? To which any intelligent person would think, “How can you do that because they are one in the same thing.” We all understand if you work for the Red Cross institution then you have accepted the purpose of that institution. Therefore you cannot make a distinction between people of an institution and what they do. Either we support them and what they do or we don’t.

Neither can we separate a people of an organization from the leadership of the organization. The Democrats would like you to think that the war is the result of bad leadership so in that way they can say, “we support the troops but we don’t support the war because it’s the result of bad leadership.” However, that is equivalent to saying, “Because the leadership of the Red Cross made a bad decision I do not support the work of the Red Cross.” If you really and truly supported the Red Cross that would be a dumb thing to say would it not? You would understand the work of Red Cross needs to go on while you remedy the leadership issue.

However, is that the way the Democrats have behaved? They debate resolutions that condemn the work of the troops and ponder cutting off support for them so they can stop what they are doing as they say, “we support the troops.” Don’t be fooled, for words to be true they must be matched by actions that back up those words; otherwise they are nothing more than a lie.

WHY I DON’T TRUST ANY THING MUSLIMS SAY OR DO

I often hear people say that moderate Muslims need to speak out against radical Muslims. When I hear such statements I think to myself that those making such statements are ignorant of the teaching of Islam. Even If I hear a “moderate” Muslim speaking out against radical Islam I don’t trust what they have to say. Why do I think that? The reason I think it is because of one of the basic tenets of Islam is that it approves of lying and deception.

Historically Muslins have used lying as a means of advancing Islam. “unlike most religions, within Islam there are certain provisions under which lying is not simply tolerated, but actually encouraged. The book "The spirit of Islam," by the Muslim scholar, Afif A. Tabbarah was written to promote Islam. On page 247, Tabbarah stated: "Lying is not always bad, to be sure; there are times when telling a lie is more profitable and better for the general welfare, and for the settlement of conciliation among people, than telling the truth. To this effect, the Prophet says: 'He is not a false person who (through lies) settles conciliation among people, supports good or says what is good." http://www.islamreview.com

From Mohammed the example was set that lying to advance the cause was justified. “He often lied and instructed his followers to do the same. He rationalized that the prospect of success in missions to extend Islam's influence overrode Allah's initial prohibitions against lying. A good example of sanctioned lying is the account of the assassination of Kaab Ibn al-Ashrf, a member of the Jewish tribe, Banu al-Nudair. It had been reported that Kaab had shown support for the Quraishites in their battle against Mohammed. This was compounded by another report that infuriated Mohammed. It was alleged that Kaab had recited amorous poetry to Muslim women. Mohammed asked for volunteers to rid him of Kaab Ibn al-Ashraf. As Mohammed put it, Kaab had "Harmed Allah and His Apostle." At that time Kaab Ibn al-Ashraf, and his tribe were strong, so it was not easy for a stranger to infiltrate and execute the task. A Muslim man by the name of Ibn Muslima, volunteered for the murderous project on the condition that Mohammed would allow him to lie. With Mohammed's consent, Ibn Muslima, went to Kaab and told him fabricated stories that reflected discontent about Mohammed's leadership. When he had gained Kaab's trust he lured him away from his house one night and murdered him in a remote area under the cover of darkness.” http://www.islamreview.com

The facts are that the provisions within Islam allow Muslims to not only lie but at the same time placate any reservations they may have about doing so. “Among these are:

• War is deception.
• The necessities justify the forbidden.
• If faced by two evils, choose the lesser of the two.

These principles are derived from passages found in the Quran and the Hadith.

In the Quran, Allah, allegedly, says:

" Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but He will call you to account for your deliberate oaths: for expiation, feed ten indigent persons, on a scale of the average for the food of your families; or clothe them; or give a slave his freedom. If that is beyond your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths ye have sworn. But keep to your oaths. Thus doth Allah make clear to you His signs, that ye may be grateful." Surah 5:89

"Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness (vain) in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing." Surah 2:225

"Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief, except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith - but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty." Surah 16: 106

The noted Islamic commentator, Al-Tabary explained Surah 16:106 as a verse that had been revealed to Mohammed after he learned that Ammar Ibn Yasser was forced to deny his faith in Mohammed when kidnapped by the Banu Moghera tribe. Mohammed consoled Ammar by telling him, "If they turned, you turn." (Meaning: if they again capture you, you are allowed to deny me again.)

These and similar passages from the Quran clearly reveal that Muslims' unintentional lies are forgivable and that even their intentional lies can be absolved by performing extra duties. It is also clear that if forced to do so, Muslims can lie while under oath and can even falsely deny faith in Allah, as long as they maintain the profession of faith in their hearts. “http://www.islamreview.com

Then there is another aspect of Islam which teaches that lying is justified if it prevents harm to other Muslims. “The Arabic word, "Takeyya", means "to prevent," or guard against. The principle of Al Takeyya conveys the understanding that Muslims are permitted to lie as a preventive measure against anticipated harm to one's self or fellow Muslims. This principle gives Muslims the liberty to lie under circumstances that they perceive as life threatening. They can even deny the faith, if they do not mean it in their hearts. Al-Takeyya is based on the following Quranic verse:

"Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution (prevention), that ye may Guard yourselves from them (prevent them from harming you.) But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah." Surah 3: 28

According to this verse a Muslim can pretend to befriend infidels (in violation of the teachings of Islam) and display adherence with their unbelief to prevent them from harming him.

Under the concept of Takeyya and short of killing another human being, if under the threat of force, it is legitimate for Muslims to act contrary to their faith. The following actions are acceptable:

• Drink wine, abandon prayers, and skip fasting during Ramadan.
• Renounce belief in Allah.
• Kneel in homage to a deity other than Allah.
• Utter insincere oaths. http://www.islamreview.com

Elitist are especially susceptible to the trickery of Islam because of their inherit belief that you can work everything out if people will just sit down and talk things out. Muslims will be more than willing to sit down and “talk things out” and will tell you what ever you what to hear and never blink an eye while lying to you the entire time.

If you will recall those Muslims that attack us on 9/11 used the very principles as described above while planning and preparing their attack. Don’t think for a moment they won’t do it again and again. If you will stand against this evil religion you can never believe anything they say.

For those who thing this is not very tolerant or too harsh, you need to ask yourself just how tolerant are muslims, I think the answer is self evident.